DCC systems, how to choose which one?Which system to use?This is, of course, a subject of endless debate.Every system has it's strengths and weaknesses.I'll present some of my thoughts and lessons learned here.Starting the decision process, do you really want DCC?Let's make sure you are here for the right reason, i.e. for most people, DCC provides some unique, or much easier to use features:multiple train control on the same trackadvanced remote control featuresconsisting of multiple locos, especially with "smarts" for lighting and directionMany choices in equipment, and interoperability, i.e. not "stuck" to all equipment by one supplier.even more advanced features like position location, automatic loco recognition, etc.So to begin the decision process, you really need to think about how you want your layout to operate when it's "finished":If you are sure you will use just a few locos, and limited use of advanced functions, maybe you should reconsider if you want DCC at all. Wireless battery operation has a lot going for it. No track power, no worrying about scrubbing the oxide from brass track (although you should go stainless for track power), relatively low cost if you have just a few locos, or run a trailing car with batteries and a receiver.Do you really want them to run by remote control, or are they just circulating on loops, one loco to each loop.OK, now my strong recommendation: if you are going to run DCC, do NOT get a limited or beginner system, entry system, or components you will stop using when your layout grows towards completion. There are ways that systems can grow, but you do not want to buy a system that is "hamstrung" from the start.(in my opinion, this leaves out LGB, CVP, MRC, Bachmann, etc.)Also, think long and hard about systems that are not really 100% DCC. There are many systems out there that are half and half.I would recommend you choose from NCE, Zimo, Digitrax, Lenz, ESU or Massoth. (not in any particular order). Furthermore, in the USA, you need to be sure you can get the support you want. For example Massoth is great in Europe and the UK, but honestly pretty miserable here (contact me for war stories on Massoth support in the US). Lenz likewise used to be quite well supported, but it is a shadow of it's former self. Finally in the USA, ESU is not strong on support.These are the big boys, and these are the companies where the next great set of features will come from.Alright, alright, which one?A few things to "un learn" first! You need to go into the decision making process unadulterated.Remember that your decoder selection is pretty much independent of the control system you use, so do not get caught up in the belief your control system must be the same manufacture as the decoders. This is the first mistake many people make.There is a caveat to this, some decoders have features that are most easily used with the same brand control system, i.e. Zimo has a whole bunch of features built into the throttles that make the sound customization easier.Some of the transponding (location) features are more fully integrated into the control system, although this is still in flux and not well standardized. So if this is really important, you need to research this. This can also be connected to the needs of a fully automated layout. Read up on it.What was NOT important to me (Greg):Why start here? Because a typical problem in this hobby is people unable to make a decision. The usual way a new person goes about this is to compile a HUGE list of features and try to figure out which is "best".A better way to get to an answer is to ELIMINATE options that are unimportant, so you can make your decision on fewer criteria. Take the analogy of buying the "best" car. If you know you will often have more than 2 passengers, you can ELIMINATE consideration of 2-seaters. If you want to pull a heavy trailer, you can ELIMINATE consideration of a small, light vehicle.I am not into transponding (location of trains) in an outdoor layout. On a large club layout indoors, with multiple blocks, etc, transponding is fun, but I walk alongside the trains, or run them where I can see them at all times, so there is no big benefit for me. It also adds quite a level of complication. If I ever want working signals, I'll put in simple block detection.I am not wanting automated remote control built into the DCC system. In my opinion that is somewhat limited, I use JMRI software, it's free, and it supports most DCC systems. I can automate to a degree, but you really need some detection scheme to "know" where the trains are. There are plenty of options with the various systems, so I figure it's not going to be an issue if I want it in the future.Many DCC systems also provide "streamlined" methods of programming unique feature in THEIR decoders. It does make it easier, but again, I want the freedom to choose the decoders I use, and all the systems listed above program easily. Also again, I can get JMRI software for free that supports almost every decoder from a computer, and can store their custom programming if desired.This "exercise" helped me eliminate "false advantages" from various systems. Often the advantages touted of systems are unique features for only their hardware. If you REALLY have to have these unique features, then by all means, buy what you want, but you may be locking yourself into a smaller selection of equipment you can use unnecessarily.Now that I have leveled the playing field, what is important to me were the things I would use most of the time:Easily selecting a locomotiveEasily consisting multiple locomotives into one train (MU diesels, doubleheading steam, adding helpers)Ease of use to control turnoutsControlling accessories (mostly turnouts)Operating the sound systems' features.Reliable and extensible wireless controlThrottles that are easy to see and operateHistory of updates for features or bugs or enhancementsGood customer service recordGood support on forums, i.e. user baseWhat about throttles?Basically, using the system will be centered around the throttle, how easy it is to use, i.e. the user interface, so this is an important decision.(Normally the system has a bus or wireless component that connects the throttles/radio base stations to the controller (which transmits the DCC commands), and they are pretty much equal, no big differences in terms of implementation.)From my long experience with software, I know that the fastest way to operate a system is a bunch of dedicated "buttons", (as opposed to multiple levels of menus). If you have ever been in a BMW car where there is a big knob, and you keep turning and pushing to "dig down" to the item you need, you have an example of too "deep" or complex of a menu structure.The display should be large, not just the size of the display, but the information on it. A large display with teeny characters is no good. It should be sunlight visibleExtra"fluff" in the information screen is of no real utility to me. I don't really care to know the voltage or current at the expense of smaller characters on the speed or function status.Graphic symbols for functions are only helpful if they are customizable and help me operate things. One example is function buttons for sound. A picture of a bell is easy for anyone to recognize, remembering "function 9" is not.For me, the NCE pro cab won hands down. It has a 2 line monochrome screen that is very visible in sunlight, and it is backlit.Recently I have changed over a Zimo system, which has some better things and some worse things. I do miss the large screen and extremely sunlight readable screen of the NCE. The Zimo had other features that I needed over the NCE. I'm putting up with the "too busy" display on the Zimo. It is a touch screen though, that has some advantates.An additional consideration was wireless operation. The NCE wireless controller works and looks exactly like the wired one, same for the Zimo.Also, I liked the fact that it is a duplex system, i.e. when you press a button, you get confirmation that the command was received. If you send a command and do not know if it was received, then it's difficult to tell what the problem is. Many systems are not duplex. The Zimo is also duplex and better communications range and speed. In all the systems I have recommended the wireless operation is good, except the Digitrax, it's not real reliable for outdoor layouts.Consisting:This is a major feature of DCC, both for steam locos and diesels (or a mix!). Basically this allows a single control of multiple locomotives in one train, whether they are all together, or spread out along the train (distributed power). I run consists virtually all the time with diesels, so I need it convenient and easy, therefore the "support" for consisting in a DCC system is important.First, let me explain consisting a bit, since there is a LOT of confusion on this, and people using terms incorrectly, and inconsistently. Also virtually EVERY manufacturer uses different or conflicting terms. My definitions focus on how the consisting is controlled, not marketing or trying to convince customers to go their way.Address consisting - all locos have the same address - the decoder and the system is unaware of any consisting, all functions go to all locos, called all kind of names by various manufacturersCommand Station consisting - the command station is told which locos are where in the consist and the command station manages how they are controlled, functions, etc. it sends commands to EVERY loco in the consist. It's clear this uses more bandwidth and can be a problem on large layouts. - NCE calls it "old style" consisting, not helpful.Decoder-based consisting - all the consist "knowledge" can be in the decoder, the the important part is that the decoder is given a "consist address" via CV19, and the decoders react to that address. There are features to change whether decoders accept specific function commands, i.e. a decoder can be told to ignore a horn command, or a lighting command.Throttle-based consisting - really pretty much the same as #2, but now the "data base" resides in the throttle, not the command stations. Some versions allow sharing/exporting this information between throttles. 1. Address consisting - all locos have the same address - the decoder and the system is unaware of any consisting, all functions go to all locos, called all kind of names by various manufacturers, sometimes known as basic consisting long ago, when DCC was pretty new. Other terms have been used but they lead to confusion.The DCC system has no clue if there are one or more locomotives "listening" on this address.Also the locomotives have no clue they are in a consist.Any system can do this, since neither the DCC system nor the decoders in the locos "know" what is happening.All locos have lighting on all the time, no matter where they are in the consist.Pain in the butt since you cannot "make up" a consist on the mainline, since they are not independently controllable. 2. Command Station consisting - the command station is told which locos are where in the consist and the command station manages how they are controlled, functions, etc. it sends commands to EVERY loco in the consist. It's clear this uses more bandwidth and can be a problem on large layouts. - NCE calls it "old style" consisting, not helpful.The locomotives have no clue they are part of a consist.The Command Station does "all the work" to send commands to each individual loco.The door is open for the Command Station to do intelligent things with lights, sounds and everything.Downside is sending commands to EVERY loco every time can slow the system down. Way too much traffic on a club layout for example.Consists with a large number of locos might tax the memory of the Command Station3. Decoder-based consisting - all the consist "knowledge" can be in the decoder, the the important part is that the decoder is given a "consist address" via CV19, and the decoders react to that address. There are features to change whether decoders accept specific function commands, i.e. a decoder can be told to ignore a horn command, or a lighting command.Often called Advanced consisting even though the NMRA never uses the term. It has "advanced control" There are additional CV's in the loco decoders so they have an ADDITIONAL "consist address" and set other parameters on how the lights, bell, horn, etc. behave in a consist. Once you have set these parameters in all locomotives, then you can command the consist with the single consist address, which is a short address, and the DCC system does not need to know this is a consist. the consist address is set in each locolocomotives CAN be set to ignore their "normal" address for safetyconfiguration of which loco acts on functions, like horn, bell, lights can be individually configure as prototype.There is a specialized Consist Control command that provides additional control to the locos in the consist (not all decoders support this properly)4. Throttle-based consisting - really pretty much the same as #2, but now the "data base" resides in the throttle, not the command stations. Some versions allow sharing/exporting this information between throttles.Some additional features can be utilized, like sharing consist information with another throttle, usually by LCCOtherwise not a great idea since if you don't have sharing of information between throttles then you can have conflictsNeeds a mechanism to hand over a consist to another throttleIn terms of a system, is going the wrong way, adding memory and function to each throttle, makes the overall system more expensive and complex.Utilized by companies that want to sell their throttles into another manufacturers' system, but clearly cannot integrate it software wise There are some advantages and disadvantages to each method, but for people that use consisting a lot, advanced consisting is the only thing that makes sense. Thus you want a system that supports advanced consisting if you will run multiple locos. This means that the DCC system should make it EASY to program locos to join and leave a consist, not spending a lot of time programming individual CV's for each loco.Again, the NCE system is a great example of very good support. There are dedicated buttons on the throttle to create, add to, remove and delete a consist. It supports all 3 consisting modes.After 5 years, my Zimo system finally is still getting consisting "fleshed out". They only support Universal consisting for now, but I have faith, in that they continuously improve the product, and they have a powerful platform.Some detailed pro's and con's of various types of consisting:Basic / Address Consisting. The only pro's I can find is that any system can do this, since nothing in the system understands that the addresses are "shared" among a number of locos. On the con side: now you can no longer individually run locos, since they share the same address. Also when programming on the main, all the locos will get the same command. This is really dumb and actually goes against the fundamental advantages of remote control of individual locos.Universal / Old Style Consisting. Again, the only pro I can find is that any system can do this. Again, the locomotives in the consist have no clue they are in a consist. The con's are many, the biggest is that by having to send every command to every loco in your consist, then a consist of 4 locos will QUADRUPLE the number of commands sent in the system. This usually results in sluggish system response, missed commands, and general limitations of just how many locos and other things can run. Another big negative is that now the system needs to "remember" the consist components, so you start taxing the storage space on the system or throttle. Another negative is that if you don't have a really smart command station, only one throttle may "know about" the consist. It get's worse when you think about the lighting and sounds. Now the system needs to do something smart about which unit sounds the horn and bell. Which unit has the front or rear headlight when. Some systems do not do anything, and when you sound the horn it blows on all locos. Some systems do remember the direction of the consist, so the appropriate horn or bell goes and the right headlight comes on. Even though this CAN be done correctly, it's normally done poorly. The system limitations often rear their ugly heads soon, for example AirWire, often touted as DCC can only have ONE consist per throttle and a maximum of 4 locos in the consist. It does try to handle the lights and sounds correctly If someone wants to run your consist, they cannot just take it over, they need to either take your physical throttle, or they need to "build" the consist on thier throttle. You can easily see that Universal / Old Style consisting is really a crutch.Advanced Consisting. This is where DCC shows it's capabilities, and why many people use it. Basically there is a third address "available" in decoders (besides the short address and the long address). This is the consist address. You can easily switch between using the "normal" address for a loco and the consist address. When using the consist address, the system only sends one command to the consist address, so it has the economy of commands that Basic / Address consisting has. But each loco is still individually addressable. Also there are CV settings for EACH loco that tell it how to act when in a consist, so you can tailor the lighting, sounds, momentum, etc. These configurations allow you to have locomotives in the front, rear and middle of a train, and behave properly. Also, since you can still individually control the locos without reprogramming, you can "build" the consist by driving the locomotives to each other and then running the consist as a unit. It's also easy to add and remove locomotives from the consist, and in a similar way to cut on and off a helper loco. The reality is that any modern system should allow and support advanced consisting.Some final notes:Go see one of these systems in action if you can, even if it is on an HO layout.If you are deciding between Digitrax and NCE, or just want to see them in action, watch this video. (It's pretty accurate, some small mistakes, but overall gives you a good idea) (If you buy a Digitrax after watching this, don't blame me later)
DCC main page(remember: links to sub-pages at the bottom of this page)click to jump to the bottomImportant note:There is a lot of complete crap information about DCC out there. (sounds strong, but justified) The DCC Wiki is severely flawed, and many "wannabe engineers" parrot this information and other really incorrect information. I have given up trying to talk sense to the editors of this junk, all the arguments end in "well I can't prove it, but I've been doing this for years"...I've decided to make a page about this, after having protracted arguments with people who apparently consider themselves experts, but with no solid foundation of fact.Here's the link to the page, so if you are finding huge errors on this page, you may already be "infected" with bad information, and go here to see these published errors, and the FACTS of why they are wrong.DCC misinformation debunkingOverview and introduction to DCCOK, while I think this falls into the FAQ category, I am going to put my "DCC introduction" here. I really suggest you read this. Yes, I know, you are excited, and want to know which system is "best" RIGHT NOW so you can run out and buy it and get started. That is the wrong way to go about this, please do yourself a favor and read.I want to take a different "tack" than how the subject is often explained. No need to dive into the internal technology, show waveforms, describe binary numbers or even explain CV's right now. That's not what you need to know right now.There are also books and presentations on DCC, but often this information is either biased to a particular manufacturer, or 10 to 15 years old. (The much-vaunted "Big Book of DCC" is completely slanted to Digitrax and was published in 1999). I recently tried to correct a post on another popular "DCC wiring" forum, and the author and owner of the group would not even bother to respond, my post got nowhere.If you are new to DCC, my best advice is to FORGET everything you have heard about DCC, unless you have a friend that uses it successfully and can explain it to you, and is open to options other than his personal choice. (good luck!).A good life lesson: if you are asking questions of an "expert" and that person cannot explain things to you in layman's terms, get yourself a different "expert". Try this simple technique, it will show up the charlatans and pompous know-it-alls.If you are new to the hobby, or have been listening to someone who does not use DCC, you probably have a head full of bad information (especially battery power people). It is no longer 15 years ago when the whole thing was unreliable, user unfriendly, and difficult to understand. If you have been given that impression, that person is not familiar with today's DCC, or is a battery junkie. This is what you will hear from people who don't understand it, or are anti-DCC, there are plenty of people like this, unfortunately.Stop listening to people who have a chip on their shoulder, know nothing about the subject or just want to show everyone they made the right decision no matter what. (Emperors new clothes)Here is a link to a nice introduction to DCC presented by Eric Eggel to the O Scale West convention in 2015, download and read it. DCC Intro pdf ... just read the first few pages, it's from an O scale club, so take that into account.To start: Let's talk about what DCC can do for you:Uses track power - less expensive than batteries and chargers, easier to install, and you can have remote control and sound and smoke in tiny locos, and never worry if your batteries will run out too fast. (typical naysayers tell you that battery power is cheaper, BS: list up the costs yourself)True independent operation of multiple locos on the same track.Reduced wiring complexity, no need for separate power "blocks" in 99% of layoutsProducts available from many different manufacturers, lots of options and since it is a standard, you can "mix and match" components.Many different throttles to use, and different levels of functions and complexity, size, etc. Pick what you like.Interfaces to computers with software that allows automated running. There are plenty of free software packages by the way.Biggest lie from naysayers: Because there are many different features, it's too much work to learn them all. Complete crap, you can learn just the few basics, and then only learn the features you prefer. Kind of like politics and "scare tactics".Using DCCWhen someone is evaluating using a new system, you normally talk "user-friendly", so I will try to look at it from a new person's perspective. A new user wants to get up and running quickly, so the basic functions need to be simple, and more importantly, there need to be "default" settings to help this.(I have to also set the stage with some basic assumptions, the locomotives have sound already also.)So, these first steps would be (in my opinion) (and picking non-DCC terminology):connecting the system to the track (just 2 wires)connecting any components together (normally just plug the throttle into the "command station", not needed with wireless throttles)taking a new (out of the box) locomotive with a factory installed DCC decoder (receiver), identifying the locomotive's "name", i.e. "what I have to do it reference this loco".telling the system I want to control this locomotive (normally a 2 or 4 digit number)setting the direction of the locomotive (usually a direction button on the throttle)increasing or decreasing the speed of the locomotive. (usually a knob or roller or buttons)Blowing the whistle/horn (almost always a clearly labelled dedicated button)Ringing the bell (again a clearly marked, dedicated button)These functions should be VERY simple. In my opinion, if you cannot show someone how to do this in under 5 minutes, then it is NOT user-friendly. (I have done this with a 5 year old in 5 minutes)After this, then you would desire to go to the next level:customizing the locomotive name/identifierhaving a "quick list" of 2-3 locomotives "saved" in the throttlebeing able to switch between locomotives easilycustomizing the momentum of the locomotive for more realistic operationhaving a simple way to control more soundseasily running locomotives in multiple units or doubleheaded, or really anywhere in a train. (American bias)Believe it or not, all of this is easy given a "good" system. These are the things I look for in a system myself, and when recommending to newcomers. Funny, but some of the most popular and expensive systems fail these criteria.OK Greg, I was patient, but what's the answer? What's the "best" system?The cheaper systems have limitations (which you may not fathom yet) that really do not save you money. The better systems are really where you should go. Buying something and finding out in a year it's not doing the job is painful. Like your track, if you buy the right system, you can stay with it forever.After a lot of research and reading lots of forums, I first settled on the NCE system for a number of reasons, I really like the Pro throttle, and the computer interface. The throttle has very good menus and operation, and the computer interface allows me to use the JMRI software (free) or even run trains from my iPad, iPhone or the (far superior) Android phones (ha ha, I don't drink the Apple Kool Aid!) .NCE's wireless throttles work exactly like the wired ones, and have full duplex communications to verify the commands have been received by the system. (this turns out to be important).Since my initial decision, I have experienced excellent service by NCE, the ability to contact an engineer at NCE for problems, and the great Yahoo forum for NCE. I'm still very happy years later.After about 9 years, I changed to Zimo, because I needed some unique features they offered. It is a more complex system, and I often miss my NCE system, but I made the choice for some very specific and unique features that Zimo has.There are some new systems by TCS which have good throttles. The other competitors like ESU or Massoth are somewhat crypitic, and more so when customizing decoders. How DCC works in general:DCC uses a customized AC wave on the rails. The wave differs from the AC in your house in that the DCC wave is square, not sinusoidal, and the frequency of the AC varies to provide the commands. This is very like how a FM radio signal varies frequency to make your music sounds.A DCC system by NMRA definition uses 4 logical components (sometimes two or more of these are in the same "box"):A command station, the central component, which creates the DCC commands to the locomotive. It takes direction from throttles/cabs, and generates a low voltage DCC signal.A booster, which takes the low voltage DCC COMMANDS from the command station and BOOSTS it to higher voltage and amperage and puts it to the rails.Throttle(s), which connect to the command station (wired and/or wireless) which have the controls for speed, direction, and function buttons for sound, lights, etc.Decoder(s), in locomotive, rolling stock, and stationary ones that can control turouts, that "pick up" power and commands from the rails and controls the loco, lights, sounds, and optional extras. (not all decoders have sound in them)Important note: The DCC power is a square wave AC signal. The timing/frequency of the signal is the "data" and the signal can be converted to power with a simple full wave bridge rectifier. This design makes it much more resistant to low voltage, bad connections, etc, since the power and data are combined. It's easy to "harvest" DC power for constant lighting, etc.DCC decoders for G scaleG scale has some special requirements over smaller scales.Higher current necessary for larger motors (several amps)Higher voltage than the other scales (24 volts)Higher audio power output for sound decoders (2 to 5 watts)Note: initially there were only decoders that controlled the motor and lights in one package. Later there were decoders for sound only. Now you can get a single decoder that has both motor control and sound in it. (Saves money, space and wiring effort). Very few manufacturers make these separately now.One relatively recent capability is using the motor BEMF (Back ElectroMotive Force) such that the locomotive's sound varies according to load, not just speed. (BEMF is a voltage produced by the electric motor that is proportional to load on the motor). The best decoders do this. Older or less expensive decoders only use voltage or the "speed step" to do this.There are 2 ways to have sound and motor control that truly follows engine load:an all-in-one decoder that combines sound and motor functions on a single board2 decoders: a motor decoder that "communicates" the BEMF levels to a sound decoder. The only practical way to do this is done is through the SUSI (Serial User Standard Interface). This method was the only way initially, but now is almost gone in current production, since it costs more, takes more hardware and space.Why higher current & voltage and how much:It's pretty obvious that physically larger and heavier locomotives and trains will require more power to run. Power is a combination of voltage and current. Under heavy loads, some locos can draw many amps. There is a large variance, but you should assume that your loco can draw at least 3 amps continuously under load. Note the table 4.2 of the NMRA standard, see the much higher voltage: https://www.nmra.org/sites/default/files/standards/sandrp/Draft/Elec/s-9_electricaldraft.pdfMeasuring DCC voltage and currentThe problem you will have if you are new to the hobby, you will have a hard time knowing what current your locos draw. Also, you cannot measure DCC voltage directly, since while it is AC, it is a square wave, and only expensive meters can read this accurately.Thus, I strongly recommend getting a DCC volt/amp meter, and actually MEASURE voltage and current under load for yourself. There are so many variables, it's really a wide range.Below is the RRAMPMETER by DCC specialtiesAlternatively, you can get a "True RMS AC multimeter", but beware, the cheapo ones lie and they don't work. Stick with Fluke or Hewlett Packard. If you are in the UK, you can buy an "Alpha" meter by DCC conceptshttps://www.dccconcepts.com/product/alpha-meter-for-dc-or-dcc/ Decoder requirements and informationUnfortunately, some decoder manufacturers rate their units optimistically, so you have to take that into consideration. In most cases I recommend a 5 amp decoder. There are some decoders that are rated lower that have no problems, like the original QSI, which can be run at 3 amps solid all day. Likewise, the Digitrax decoders have the reputation of blowing up on loads way under their rating. SoundTraxx also rates their decoders optimistically.Current, running and stallYou also need to realize that the rating of a decoder is normally the "running" current, not the "stall current".Note that EVERY time a loco does a standing start, it draws it's full stall current until the motor have a chance to spool up. This usually occurs at a short duty cycle unless you slam up the throttle, but the peak currents are still there if only for a short time. The Shay's peak current when running on track power is somewhat impacted by it's power pickup and wiring resistance. At the pickups, the stall current for the Shay at 18 volts or so is more than 7 amps. I could actually never physically stall the thing because it had so much torque. However, this implies that the actual motor stall resistance (which I never directly measured) is no greater than 7 ohms per motor. This is typical for Bachmann and Aristo motors. I've toasted HO decoders in ONE motor large scale locos (those with the larger can motors). You can, if you wish, run trials by fire but it's your dime. Fortunately most decoder manufacturers have "no fault" warranties now and if you burn one up, you MIGHT be able to get it replaced if the manufacturer doesn't figure out what you did. My preference is to use a beefy decoder and not mess with all this. I did find that the Aristo PCC could easily be driven from an HO decoder but that is because it uses small, high stall resistance, motors and high reduction gearing. An average motor current at 18 volts is about 200 to 250 mA, THIS is in the range of an HO decoder.Voltage and current can be a real problem for people that run prototypical speeds on more modern freight and passenger trains. It turns out that top speed is usually controlled by the "last few volts" on the track. Also, there is a non linear relationship of speed vs voltage.Important note: There are some DCC decoders out there that do not handle G scale voltages well at all, even they are advertised as such. Decoders that meet the NMRA specs will have no problems.The "Quasinami" (Soundtraxx oem) in the Bachmann 3 truck shay will freak out at somewhere around 20-21 volts. This is typical of many Soundtraxx decoders.There are several decoders from Germany, such as the Dietz DLE 2M, that will not handle voltages over 18 volts. (It's actually more complex, where the 3 amp decoder cannot handle 2 amps and 18 volts at the same time, less amperage you might be able to run a higher voltage). This particular decoder is not really made by Dietz, but by Uhlenbrook.The situation has probably come about by the manufacturers just putting larger transistors on the HO decoders, and not considering the necessity of higher voltage requirements.Sound power output:You need at least one watt audio power, and some sound decoders have more, but remember that in the world of sound, 2 watts is NOT twice the volume as 1 watt. This is true because your perception of volume is not linear, but exponential. This means do not agonize between 1 watt and 2 watts, you might notice the difference between 1 watt and 5 watts. Getting a "large scale" decoder normally guarantees sufficient power output. Combination decoders:QSI Solutions Titan, by QSI Solutions, oem'ed from QSI Industries. New decoders that have motor control and sound. They are inexpensive (~$200), sound great, and make a plug and play decoder for Aristo locomotives (plugs into Aristo socket, no wiring). One of the best sound libraries, and new sound files are always being added. Unfortunately only found on the used market now.Zimo, very high quality decoders. Huge selection of customization commands, but poor US "sound library", and many of the good sound files cost $25-$35 extra. Their programmer is more expensive, and documentation is translated German. Best low speed motor control.ESU - Loksound - from Germany, documentation sketchy and just a few US dealers. They have downloadable sound files, but again, poor US sound libraries. A bit tricky to set up. Good quality.SoundTraxx - I waited 6 years for the large scale Tsunami, by SoundTraxx - They never made it, but OEM'd some It looks as though they will never make these, too bad, they get great reviews on their HO ones. They made one OEM version for the Bachmann 3 truck shay, but no documentation, and it will often shut off on track voltages near 21 volts, which is necessary for large scale. The newer large scale ones are poorly scaled up HO decoders, and overload and overvoltage easily.Massoth - very popular in Europe, they also make/made a lot of the LGB DCC stuff. An overly complex system that is a programming nightmare when you want to customize. If you buy this stuff, do not deviate from their setup, you will be sorry.Motor only decodersLenz makes wonderful decoders, but nothing with high enough current capability for all G scale in my opinion. They work well with D.I.E.T.Z. sound decoders. SUSI is a serial interface that communicates the engine load and status to the sound decoder.The total cost of the 2 decoders is high, and there is little support and few American sounds on the sound decoders. Maybe this will grow in the future, but cost wise, it's probably never going to be competitive with the single combination decoders.Basically forget buying one of these unless you are already stuck with using an older sound only decoder.Sound only decoders Phoenix - Great sounds and wide range of locos. The 2k2 was very popular, recently replaced by the P9B decoder. It is expensive (~$220). Works on DC too, so it has been very popular. Really limited in DCC operation, and expensive when you realize you need a motor decoder too, and the sound is not "coordinated" between the 2 decoders. Their first combination decoder is underpowered in current capability, and adolescent in its feature list.D.I.E.T.Z. - popular in Europe, has typical problems of limited support, poor documentation, limited number of US loco sounds.Ullenbrock - The Uhlenbrock is the Deitz rebadged, as is the programmer. I've left some of the other manufacturers out, they just make limited or difficult to use products in my opinion. As you become more knowledgeable you might try other products.DCC power suppliesAgain, you need big power. I have a 10 amp system that puts out 24 volts RMS (you need a special meter to measure the RMS voltage of a DCC supply) I think I might have to go to 15 amps, since I intend to have MU diesels of 5 or 6 USA trains F units. The "worst" loco that would be MU'd is probably the USA trains GP9, which has been measured at 9 amps or so at full stall. The moral here, 5 amps is not enough, and 8 might be marginal.Many DCC power supplies are just a big AC transformer. You should have a circuit breaker and probably a fuse also. No real magic here, but I find unregulated supplies have noticeable "sag" under load. If you want to run higher speeds, like passenger or modern freight, a regulated supply is best.Regulated supplies are DC, and not all boosters (see below) will accept DC input. I am very happy with my NCE 10 amp system which does accept either AC or DC. I am using a regulated power supply and it's much better and helps get proper top speed.DCC boosterThis "boosts" the DCC signal to the current and voltage to the rails. It has 2 inputs and one output. You feed the DCC signal and the raw AC/DC power and it puts the DCC signal "on" the power and feeds it to the tracks. Finding high amperage boosters is hard. The easiest to find is the NCE 10 amp unit. I've found 15 and 25 amp units in Germany, but never seen or imported here from what I have seen. Some boosters have an auto reverse mechanism built in. You need this when you have reversing loops. Basically it senses a short circuit when a loco spans 2 sections of track with opposite polarities (or phase if you wish). It then reverses the track feed. You can also get auto reversing units to feed separate blocks. The DCC specialites PSX-AR is the first autoreverser that works well for large scale.DCC controllersHere's where there are strong opinions and preferences. Some people want a simple wired cab control. Advantages are ease of use for newcomers, children, and those who don't want a complex device. Disadvantages are the wire can restrict your roaming around, connector problems, hard to control advanced functions. If it takes you a lot of button pressing to control a function, then it becomes a lot less fun. Wireless simple cab control. Pretty much the same as a wired one, but wireless controls are more problematic because of the wireless range and response. There aren't too many simple ones. Many of the wireless units have slow response to commands, and are not as reliable, i.e. you blow the whistle, but it doesn't. This is because most wireless units use one-way communication. The controller never knows if the receiver really got the command. This can be disasterous when you really need to stop! The big advantage is you have no tether, the disadvantages are battery life problems, reliability, slow response, limited range, sensitivity to interference. Wireless advanced cab control. Well, if you are going wireless, why not make it easier. The NCE controller is a good choice. Computer control - another option is to interface to the controller by computer. This can allow unattended operation, advanced block control, and/or train location detection. Some computer control options also include the ability to have the computer act as a server to other computers running programs to control locomotives. KAM Industries is one example. They also have a product that lets you use a hand-held PDA as a wireless controller. One advantage of this is that the wireless communication used is a standard protocol already in widespread use, 802.ll, a.k.a. WiFi. DCC VariantsI'll expand this section. Most of the "DCC over the air" systems are not strictly DCC by definition, and ones that don't have a command station have less functionality than a real system. I will explain this.AirWiredeadrailhttp://www.s-cab.com/Books to read: (from an MLS forum thread)Digital Command Control - the comprehensive guide to DCC (Paperback) by Stan Ames (Author), Rutger Friberg (Author), Loizeaux. Edward (Author) Publisher: Tried and True Trains (July 1998) ISBN-10: 9185496499 ISBN-13: 978-9185496495 The DCC Guide (Paperback) by Don Fiehmann (Author) Publisher: Kalmbach Publishing Company (October 2007) Language: English ISBN-10: 0890246769 ISBN-13: 978-0890246764DCC Made Easy ( Paperback ) by Lionel Strang ( Author ) Publisher: Kalmbach Publishing Company DCC Projects & Applications ( Paperback ) by Mike Polsgrove ( author ) Publisher: Kalmbach Publishing Company Links to learn DCC: Matthias Manhart - Various DCC Decoder Installations http://www.beathis.ch/lgb/umbau.html Arnold's Train Web - Interesting DCC projects for largescale trains http://atw.huebsch.at/ https://sites.google.com/site/markgurries/dcc-welcome-pageDCC calculator:http://www.unitconversion.org/numbers/base-10-to-base-2-conversion.html Sub-PagesClick the links below to go "deeper" into details on individual DCC systems and other topics DCC Equipment by Manufacturer DCC Wiring Tips My Implementation DCC sound decoders DCC Programming Tips Advanced DCC Topics DCC Installations Overview DCC in Z Scale DCC S/W for PCs & Phones How to choose your DCC system DeadRail (DCC over the air)
NCE (North Coast Engineering) equipment (remember: links to sub-pages at the bottom of this page)click to jump to the bottomGeneral:I love this stuff. I do not use transponding, so I don't need the unique features of Digitrax, and I think the NCE wired and wireless throttles are the best for most users in G scale. I have more in the planning section of how I made my decision. Choosing a DCC systemBasically it is a very capable system, that works with any DCC product (except the really old pre-DCC LGB).I will only talk about the 10 amp NCE systems. Do not waste your time getting the 5 amp version, it's REALLY easy to go over 5 amps in Large scale.The company is US-based, and very helpful and professional about their products. There is a groups.io forum where real experts live and you get great help. If you really have a problem, you can get a real engineer on the phone at NCE who WILL understand the problem, not blow you off.Throttles:NCE makes a wide variety of throttles, from the "hammerhead" pro version, to small controllers with basically speed, direction and horn and bell.They make wired and wireless throttles. The wireless throttles use a full duplex 900 MHz signal, which actually has a lot of advantages, one of which is less interference, since cordless phones, Wi-Fi and cell phones are all in the 2 GHz band. Another advantage is the full duplex system verifies that your command was received by the command station, unlike simplex systems and most R/C systems.Wireless:The wireless system has a base station that plugs into the cab bus (where wired throttles also connect). This base station has 2 outputs, each of which can drive a repeater radio station. In turn each repeater has 2 more outputs, each of which can drive another repeater. This arrangement can be expanded to 31 total radio stations (1 base and 30 repeaters). If it's not obvious, you can cover an enormous layout.The range of the radios is about 100 feet or so. They are bidirectional, a big plus, you KNOW your commands get to the loco, because your throttle displays the results back from the command station.Decoders:This is the first company (in the early days of large scale DCC) to have decoders that can not melt down from high current motors. The D808 (pictured upper right in the picture below in a USAT F unit) will handle 8 amps continuous and 30 amp stall! That's about the only outstanding facet of their decoder line. No sound decoders, no servo drive, etc., just good solid motor decoders.They also have a line of accessory controllers, I have not used them, preferring the Digitrax ones.The 10 amp system has a separate booster and command station. They interconnect with a short phone cord. There are wired throttles of various types, but I prefer the Procab, that has all the controls, and it's only about $150.Boosters:They actually make several boosters, there is a 5 amp one in their 5 amp system, there is a standalone 10 amp one, and newer, a 3 amp one in the PowerCab system and a separate 5 amp one.All of their boosters are rugged and meet published specifications. For G scale, the 10 amp booster makes the most sense. It will run at 10 amps all day, and will briefly supply up to 20 amps.Interfaces:There are interfaces to allow computer control of the system, especially by JMRI software. The USB interface is a great addition. There's also a DCC packet analyzer, I have not played with mine yet: (oops, sounds like it is out of production) Systems:They make several systems, which are bundles that save money. By far the most popular is the PH-10R, the 10 amp system with radio:Firmware, and current versions:NCE is a real engineering company, and virtually all the components have upgradeable firmware. I used to list the current versions here as a quick reference, but since I'm not as active I will give you a link to Mark Gurries excellent site: https://sites.google.com/site/markgurries/home (and if you don't know who Mark Gurries is and you have NCE, you owe it to yourself to find out!) Current versions as of September 2022 per Mark Schutzer1. The current version for the Procab is version 1.3.2. The current version for the radio board code is version 1.7.3. Current RB02 is version 2.5 which includes updates to the code for both the PIC processors in the RB02.4. Current Cab06 code is version 2.1.5. Latest CS02/ PHPro command station code is version 3/22/21. Currently my PowerCab is on 165B, if you have anything less you should update.Procabv1.3 - main firmware v1.5 - radio part of procab v1.5a - supports internal antenna v1.5b - should support cab06PowerCabv1.65B - main firmware5 and 10 amp boosterNCE does not publish version informationPowerPro 10 amp command station (CS02)v2007C - 2007 does refer to the year 2007PowerPro 5 amp system (the command station part is CS02)same as PowerPro 10 amp command stationSmartBooster - note these are really command stations and boostersSB3 - 3 amp SB3a - 5 amp SB5 - 5 ampversion 1.65BSmart Booster version shows when cab plugged in or command station setup menuUSB interface - V7.x.x - Note: must be sent in to upgrade from V6.x.xRB02 base station - 2.1, to support cab06 Be sure to visit Mark Gurries' NCE site: https://sites.google.com/site/mgurriesncedcc/nce-info (use the "hamburger" menu in the upper left corner) Also Mark Schutzer's site: http://markschutzer.com/DCC_Articles/DCC_Articles_page1.htmA nice tip on serial port issues on the command station: http://www.members.optusnet.com.au/nswmn2/Serial.htm Sub-PagesClick the links below to go "deeper" into details on NCE DCC topics NCE Mods & Tips NCE Decoders NCE USB/Serial/JMRI Interfaces NCE PowerCab NCE ProCab NCE Consisting Portable 5 amp system NCE Cables